31 AUGUST 2020
BTN also goes out by email every Sunday night at midnight (UK time). To view this edition click here.
The Business Travel News
PO Box 758
Edgware HA8 4QF
+44 (0)20 8952 8383
© 2020 Business Travel News Ltd.
Charlie Cornish has been Chief Executive of the Manchester Airports Group (MAG) since 2010 and was previously Managing Director of Utility Solutions having worked for a number of manufacturing and service companies including Plessey Telecommunications, British Aerospace and Associated British Foods (ABF). His words serve as a useful background for the Webinar with Heathrow’s John Holland-Kaye on Wednesday 2 September. They work for a common cause.
"On the August Bank Holiday last year, airports across the UK were at their busiest. At Stansted, part of MAG, more than 280,000 passengers passed through its terminal in just one weekend. This year, the figure will be less than a third of that.
At Manchester, 12 months ago more than 115,000 people flew in a single day. A year on, we will be lucky to welcome 25,000 travellers.
The impact of Covid-19 – and quarantine restrictions – on the travel industry is clear for all to see. It is evident in the tens of thousands of job losses that have already been announced and the millions of holidays already cancelled.
If reports are to be believed, our government was due to debate taking a more realistic and passenger-friendly approach to quarantine decisions on Monday at its Covid Committee. But this meeting didn’t happen, and we hear it’s now due to happen today. It’s not the first time a critical decision in this area has been put off, with no credible explanation for the delay.
Indeed throughout the pandemic, there has been no evidence of any recognition from the government of the need to protect the travel industry and enable it to recover from what is undoubtedly the biggest crisis it has ever faced.
This is an industry that collectively supports around 2m jobs, with MAG alone making an economic contribution of £8.2bn to the UK each year.
We see no signs that it wants to avoid further jobs losses, or an appreciation of the critical role airports will have in the economic revival of regions across the country as we gingerly emerge from this crippling pandemic.
This in stark contrast to the approach we have seen taken by numerous governments around the world, whose decisive action to protect their aviation sectors makes clear how much value they attach to them.
From the very start of this pandemic, we have appealed for a support package for airports. But our request for business rates relief was ignored, despite lockdown.
By contrast, Germany has secured EU State Aid approval, in order to compensate airports for lost revenue and protect their futures.
The failure to recognise the need for direct financial support was disappointing to say the least, but perhaps not surprising when you consider our government already places its airports at a competitive disadvantage by levying some of the highest passenger taxes in the world.
But the impact of this decision has been amplified many times over by its sluggish, chaotic and illogical approach to travel restrictions, an area where we have watched other nations move quickly and decisively while our government has remained in its own decision-making lockdown.
Having initially imposed blanket quarantine rules on all destinations, we eventually saw “travel corridors” agreed with our most important tourism markets, following a period of stubborn procrastination, which is yet another example of this Cabinet’s inability to rise above division, put their heads down and agree a common-sense answer.
But a few short weeks after the key Spanish travel corridor was established, it was effectively closed-off again, due to soaring infection rates in the northern regions of Catalonia, Aragon and Navarre.
For those planning a trip, there was a glimmer of hope that the Balearic and Canary Islands could remain restriction-free.
But that prospect was whipped away quicker than a poolside towel left unattended for too long, as Foreign and Commonwealth Advice was aligned with the blanket quarantine rule without clear evidence and announced via media with hours to go before being implemented.
Catalonia is closer to Dundee than it is to Gran Canaria, making this blanket approach not only unnecessary and illogical, but hugely damaging to an already-ailing sector.
It seems there is an acceptance within the Department for Transport and by the Transport Secretary himself that a regionalised approach is needed, but we find ourselves months down the line and no progress has been made. With another key meeting cancelled this week, Cabinet cracks cannot seemingly be papered over, even when it comes to protecting an industry as critical as ours.
Meanwhile, we have watched the penny drop with other major nations, such as Germany, which has moved quickly to enable travel to popular resorts in the likes of Spain, while adopting a localised, targeted approach to quarantine that the UK has so far refused to consider. It is further ahead of us on testing too.
As things stand, around 50% of the most popular markets with British tourists have effectively been closed-off.
Some will point to positive news about Portugal becoming restriction-free again, but with so little of our summer remaining, so many popular destinations needlessly closed-off, so many jobs at risk and so little confidence our Prime Minister understands this urgency, you can understand why our industry feels left behind."
Also see Holland-Kaye goes live
All comments are filtered to exclude any excesses but the Editor does not have to agree with what is being said. 100 words maximum
Ray Grainger, UK
Well said Charlie. The Government doesn't want to care about the travel industry. They will wake up too late to the hundreds of thousands of layoffs in the 4th quarter. Most of what they do is just too late not JIT.